<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Not all interaction is created socially</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markpollard.net/not-all-interaction-is-created-socially/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markpollard.net/not-all-interaction-is-created-socially/</link>
	<description>By Mark Pollard</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 04:39:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: An indefinition of community plus more thoughts about anonymity</title>
		<link>http://www.markpollard.net/not-all-interaction-is-created-socially/comment-page-1/#comment-532</link>
		<dc:creator>An indefinition of community plus more thoughts about anonymity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 03:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markpollard.net/?p=36#comment-532</guid>
		<description>[...] articles: Not all interaction is created socially My Ignite presentation about building [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] articles: Not all interaction is created socially My Ignite presentation about building [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Savage</title>
		<link>http://www.markpollard.net/not-all-interaction-is-created-socially/comment-page-1/#comment-434</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Savage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 17:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markpollard.net/?p=36#comment-434</guid>
		<description>Yo Mark,

This is wear I&#039;ll get myself in more of a tangle! :) 

A vehicle is a construct yeah but not in the same way. I think a vehicle implies a one way street, it takes you from A&gt;B, with restrictions of course. These are incredibly complex now and offer the user to construct themselves in loadsa different ways, you&#039;ll need a persona/avatar but the difference between real-life and digital will be massive. People will build their avatars for wholly different reasons so it becomes a bit of an acting/self-fulfilling prophecy-type situation. 

It&#039;s not really about names/faces, it&#039;s what the person says and how they are judged by others and so judge themselves and alter what they say = who they are in the digital world. I think your point here on authenticity is key, you assume when you join a community people are there for similar reasons. But how can you ever know? Or with a research head, ever gain insights from profiles which may not even represent an actual person?

Rant over. Sorry if this confuses more. I&#039;m gonna do some more reading and get back to you! I like your blog, you talk about interesting stuff :)

Ps. See Katie&#039;s points too -  http://zebrabites.com/2009/01/29/manufactured-insights-online-communities-part-2/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yo Mark,</p>
<p>This is wear I&#8217;ll get myself in more of a tangle! <img src='http://www.markpollard.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>A vehicle is a construct yeah but not in the same way. I think a vehicle implies a one way street, it takes you from A&gt;B, with restrictions of course. These are incredibly complex now and offer the user to construct themselves in loadsa different ways, you&#8217;ll need a persona/avatar but the difference between real-life and digital will be massive. People will build their avatars for wholly different reasons so it becomes a bit of an acting/self-fulfilling prophecy-type situation. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s not really about names/faces, it&#8217;s what the person says and how they are judged by others and so judge themselves and alter what they say = who they are in the digital world. I think your point here on authenticity is key, you assume when you join a community people are there for similar reasons. But how can you ever know? Or with a research head, ever gain insights from profiles which may not even represent an actual person?</p>
<p>Rant over. Sorry if this confuses more. I&#8217;m gonna do some more reading and get back to you! I like your blog, you talk about interesting stuff <img src='http://www.markpollard.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Ps. See Katie&#8217;s points too &#8211;  <a href="http://zebrabites.com/2009/01/29/manufactured-insights-online-communities-part-2/" rel="nofollow">http://zebrabites.com/2009/01/29/manufactured-insights-online-communities-part-2/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Pollard</title>
		<link>http://www.markpollard.net/not-all-interaction-is-created-socially/comment-page-1/#comment-425</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Pollard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 11:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markpollard.net/?p=36#comment-425</guid>
		<description>@Chris Dig the complex thinking. But... isn&#039;t a vehicle a construct? :) My point is a little different to what you&#039;re rebutting, I think. How can you &#039;build yourself into a group&#039; if nobody knows you - persona, avatar, real-life or otherwise?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chris Dig the complex thinking. But&#8230; isn&#8217;t a vehicle a construct? <img src='http://www.markpollard.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  My point is a little different to what you&#8217;re rebutting, I think. How can you &#8216;build yourself into a group&#8217; if nobody knows you &#8211; persona, avatar, real-life or otherwise?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Savage</title>
		<link>http://www.markpollard.net/not-all-interaction-is-created-socially/comment-page-1/#comment-423</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Savage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 10:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markpollard.net/?p=36#comment-423</guid>
		<description>Wotcha - 

This is an interesting discussion, loving the dive into abstraction. 

I don&#039;t think social media are vehicles however, they&#039;re more like constructs. People rebuild themselves in the digital world and with that they achieve certain aims, unwittingly or not, whether that is a feeling of belonging, or making a connection for work purposes, or learning and increasing knowledge. It&#039;s not like for like, it&#039;s like for want/desire.

So when it comes building a group, you want people to build themselves into the group as well. Anonymity doesn&#039;t really come into it. So anonymity isn&#039;t the antithesis of community at all. In a digital community, a person is represented as what they write/display, what they (re)present as themselves.  

Using different platforms people build different selves. Authenticity here then isn&#039;t necessarily being authentic to yourself but the expectations of the group. 

And with that, my sojourn down abstraction avenue is over :-)

Ps. I tried to write this better in a post: http://geo-marketing.blogspot.com/2009/02/avatars-our-online-bodies.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wotcha &#8211; </p>
<p>This is an interesting discussion, loving the dive into abstraction. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think social media are vehicles however, they&#8217;re more like constructs. People rebuild themselves in the digital world and with that they achieve certain aims, unwittingly or not, whether that is a feeling of belonging, or making a connection for work purposes, or learning and increasing knowledge. It&#8217;s not like for like, it&#8217;s like for want/desire.</p>
<p>So when it comes building a group, you want people to build themselves into the group as well. Anonymity doesn&#8217;t really come into it. So anonymity isn&#8217;t the antithesis of community at all. In a digital community, a person is represented as what they write/display, what they (re)present as themselves.  </p>
<p>Using different platforms people build different selves. Authenticity here then isn&#8217;t necessarily being authentic to yourself but the expectations of the group. </p>
<p>And with that, my sojourn down abstraction avenue is over <img src='http://www.markpollard.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Ps. I tried to write this better in a post: <a href="http://geo-marketing.blogspot.com/2009/02/avatars-our-online-bodies.html" rel="nofollow">http://geo-marketing.blogspot.com/2009/02/avatars-our-online-bodies.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Pollard</title>
		<link>http://www.markpollard.net/not-all-interaction-is-created-socially/comment-page-1/#comment-367</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Pollard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 13:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markpollard.net/?p=36#comment-367</guid>
		<description>Wow this is such a chunky topic that a few blog posts will struggle to define all the words and ideas that we&#039;re using so that we&#039;re all on the same page at the same time when discussing it.

I&#039;m keen to hear more thoughts, ideas, and will keep pondering the beast. 

Thank you all for your thoughts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow this is such a chunky topic that a few blog posts will struggle to define all the words and ideas that we&#8217;re using so that we&#8217;re all on the same page at the same time when discussing it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m keen to hear more thoughts, ideas, and will keep pondering the beast. </p>
<p>Thank you all for your thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
